snabelen.no er en av mange uavhengige Mastodon-servere du kan bruke for å delta i det desentraliserte sosiale nettet.
Ein norsk heimstad for den desentraliserte mikroblogge-plattformen.

Administrert av:

Serverstatistikk:

359
aktive brukere

#bluesky

181 innlegg142 deltakere11 innlegg i dag

Unlike #bluesky, #mastodon is not blocked centrally in Mississippi.

Glad to hear it.

It wouldn't have been technically possible anyway, since #mastodon is decentralized.

techcrunch.com/2025/08/29/mast

(Posting reply mastodon.social/@folkerschamel, which wasn't bridged, again, but this time as new post to see if bridging is working then.)

#decentralization #activitypub #atproto #decentralizationwashing @canrith6696 @mmasnick.bsky.social @Gargron @stinerman @ikuturso @glyph @pluralistic

Replied in thread

@pluralistic @canrith6696 @mmasnick.bsky.social @Gargron @stinerman @ikuturso @glyph

"Bluesky is unavailable in Mississippi right now" as by the company #bluesky Social, PB itself. See the original post of this thread.

Plain, simple, and correct.

Your post is what I mean by #decentralizationwashing: Claiming theoretical #decentralization, but without real-world relevance. Basically nobody is using an own Personal Data Servers or alt client. And wouldn't evade the block anyway.

Even if #Bluesky could count as decentralized, I don't see how that does it any good if its infrastructure is so abstruse and hard to understand.

If you can understand what a server is, then you can pretty much grasp decentralization and the fediverse.

Compared with BS's truck about PDS's, relays, AppView, the distinction between the company and the app, etc., doesn't mastodon come out as the "easy" decentralized platform?

Have we been the normies all along?! 😱

"#Bounce adds an additional layer to [Bsky's #credibleexit]: you can now transfer your account to another protocol altogether.
In this way, the ability to use Bounce to migrate your #socialgraph from Bluesky to #Mastodon actually is a benefit to #Bluesky: it further cements their claim of providing a credible exit. This lowers the barriers for people who are unsure about trying out Bluesky, there is now a way back."

connectedplaces.leaflet.pub/3l

connectedplaces.leaflet.pubBounce, bridging and language - Connected Places

Piccolo reminder: il fediverso non è mastodon, a volte serve ricordarlo, il fediverso è molto altro!

In molti vogliono “più decentralizzazione!” e poi aprono l’ennesimo Mastodon su Masto.host o un'account bluesky. Il risultato? milioni di iscritti solo su mastodon.social, masto.host e bluesky che hanno praticamente il controllo su tutto 🤡

Questa non è proprio la rivoluzione promessa, gestire #mastodon o #bluesky è difficile e si sta diventando clienti più che gestori.

💬 @fediverso

Will Bluesky Block Most Red States?

Digesting Sarah Perez's @Sarahp great TechCrunch article on #Bluesky blocking users from Mississippi (techcrunch.com/2025/08/28/miss), and noticing that almost all the "red" states have similar laws to Mississippi (see below).

So, will Bluesky soon be blocking users from these states? Do users want to take that chance?

It's easy to set up a truly decentralized Mastodon account, even if only as a backup >>> joinmastodon.org/

"ATmosphere developers I talk to are very very aware of these limitations. They just prefer to invest their time and energy in working to improve the situation rather than arguing about the semantics of "decentralization."" by @jdp23

privacy.thenexus.today/can-we-

The Nexus Of Privacy · Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized?Nobody's changing their minds at this point, and the discourse is really
Replied in thread

@AleF2050

Now that #Bluesky has caved in to one state, don't see how they can not do the same for every other state that imposes these laws. Probably at least most 'red' states within a pretty short time. Not sure why users would want to take this risk when a perfectly good, truly decentralized public option exists. 🤷

Fortsettelse av samtale

And a companion piece: Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized?

privacy.thenexus.today/can-we-

"on different aspects of decentralization. People who saw Bluesky as centralized nine months ago still see Bluesky as centralized. People who saw Bluesky as decentralized (or decentralizing) nine months ago still see Bluesky as decentralized (or decentralizing). Nobody's changing their minds in response to new information. It's basically the same discussions rehashed again and again.

One thing that's been really striking to me in this latest iteration of this interminable discourse is that so many people in the Fediverse present the fact that 99.99% of Bluesky users are still using infrastructrure run by Bluesky PBC as if it's a gotcha that people advocating for Bluesky and the ATmosphere aren't aware of.

No, actually, ATmosphere developers I talk to are very very aware of these limitations. They just prefer to invest their time and energy in working to improve the situation rather than arguing about the semantics of "decentralization."

That sure seems like a good approach to me.

So can we please stop arguing about this already?"

The Nexus Of Privacy · Can we please stop arguing about whether Bluesky is decentralized?Nobody's changing their minds at this point, and the discourse is really

Mississippi, Bluesky, Blacksky, the ATmosphere, Mastodon, and the Fediverse

New on The Nexus of Privacy!

privacy.thenexus.today/mississ

As well as a summary of the situation (both in the ATmosphere and the Fediverse) and links to a bunch of interesting discussions, there's also a discussion of just why age verification laws are so bad.

@fediversenews

The Nexus Of Privacy · Mississippi, Bluesky, Blacksky, the ATmosphere, Mastodon, and the FediverseNow's a good time to start thinking seriously about some hard questions