As he discusses in his video, @theo@t3.gg makes his point of how he had his education provided by #OpenSource, as we all have, but kids of the future might be even further deprived.
If you're concerned about #iPadKids at all, know that one of those things poses a problem to that kids education is being coddled by multinationals.
This means you as a responsible #parent should buy #Linux phones, laptops and devices that give users the control.
Android just changed forever
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ucZx1ArrIVQ
@hopland @GrapheneOS whats your thoughts on this?
A worst case scenario Google could ditch what can be seen as legacy java runtime and instead create a new foundation that won't be open source, but directly licensed.
Then the Play store will allow the use of legacy apps temperately and provide the SDK only to licensed developers so they can transition, and at some point shed all that legacy software, which would be their deathblow against the ecosystem.
That's if vendors license from them and leave AOSP behind.
@vvbudh @hopland It won't have a major impact on GrapheneOS. See https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/114246502016147308.
@hopland They're misinformed about how it worked and what's changing.
Android has always taken the approach of it being developed in private and then having the full sources and commit history released for stable releases. Certain sub-projects were exceptions to this and had development in the open but most of it was done in private.
Stable releases of Android were open source and remain open source. Beta and Developer Preview releases were mostly not open source and remain that way.
@GrapheneOS seems like I bit the buzz again. It seems like an encumbering way of doing it though.