Nylige søk

Ingen søk nylig

Alternativer for søk

Ikke tilgjengelig på snabelen.no.
snabelen.no er en av mange uavhengige Mastodon-servere du kan bruke for å delta i det desentraliserte sosiale nettet.
Ein norsk heimstad for den desentraliserte mikroblogge-plattformen.

Administrert av:

Serverstatistikk:

359
aktive brukere

snabelen.no: OmStatusProfilkatalogPersonvernregler

Mastodon: OmLast ned appenHurtigtasterVis kildekodev4.5.0

#android

170 innlegg153 deltakere7 innlegg i dag
utzer :verify:
Warum sind und eigentlich so kack kastrierte ? Sollten die nicht problemlos 95% der Funktionen eines Desktop OS abdecken?

Man kann die heute ja problemlos an einen Bildschirm anschließen, aber es ist ein Pain in the Ass dann damit zu arbeiten.
*
SomeGadgetGuy

REPLAY CREW! Had a blast coming back this week to chat about TWO new phones that are rocking my socks! somegadgetguy.com/2025/11/10/s

419: Apple Pays Google for AI, Meta Earns on Ad Fraud, Vivo X300 Pro and OnePlus 15 Are Here!

#

*
your auntifa liza

one of the first things i do when i get an unrooted device is:

1. install @fdroidorg
2. install degoogled substitutes for Calendar, Contacts, Camera, File Manager, Gallery, IMs, Youtube, GApps Services, Search & Maps
3. revoke all permissions to apps by Google, Samsung or Lenovo
4. force stop all previous apps, ESPECIALLY the GApps store
5. keep a list of the bloatware. USA phone companies get paid to install spyware in root, so “deleting” bloatware without root is theater

myrmepropagandist

Sometimes my friends notice when, after they have been talking about something they will see an ad for it.

"my phone is spying on me!"

I used to think this was unlikely. I'd go into "while that is possible it's not reasonable..." mode.

Not so much anymore. It does seem feasible now. And I think it might be a fruitful area for privacy advocates to focus on since this *really* creeps people out.

Replied in thread
Giacomo Tesio
Well @chrysn@chaos.social, I really appreciate your good intentions and will to fight for users' .
But I was not talking about you or the few independent developers who still volunteer at these days.
I was talking about IETF effects on the Internet standards as a whole.
I'm afraid the impact of a few independent engineers is not going to balance the power of organized and well funded lobbyists.

As an example, let's stay on topic and look at RFC 9001, "Using to Secure ".
All that is said about the impoved ability of the server to identify (and thus track) the user are in two lines about session resumption (emphasys mine):
Session resumption allows servers to link activity on the original connection with the resumed connection, which might be a privacy issue for clients. Clients can choose not to enable resumption to avoid creating this correlation.
Now please notice the : the wording is set up as if clients should opt-in, but it's pretty unlikely that users will be given a choice between a personal data leak at protocol level and an imperceptible increase in connection time, in particular with 0-RTT where " Endpoints cannot selectively disregard information that might alter the sending or processing of 0-RTT".

So while I'm pretty curious about @bagder@mastodon.social's perspective, I see that managed to get a protocol designed to thwart user privacy and reduce its own server costs (even just the energy consumed during TLS hadshakes, amount to thousands dollars each day).

This way, if EU would decide to forbid tracking cookies at all, Google would get a competitive advantage over all other companies.

Now a properly working IETF would have rejected such shit, knowing that it would have been leveraged against people (and democracies) though browsers and defaults.

CC: @daniel@gultsch.social @lorenzo@snac.bobadin.icu
www.rfc-editor.orgRFC 9001: Using TLS to Secure QUIC This document describes how Transport Layer Security (TLS) is used to secure QUIC.
Replied in thread
Erhard Maria Klein

@HGU ja, genau. Sonst kannst Du nicht mehr Bahnfahren, Onlinebanking machen usw. Was ich an dem -Trend nicht so toll finde ist, dass man sich dann zusätzlich ein weiteres Gerät kauft, obwohl auch das Smartphone, das man schon hat, ein Dumbphone sein könnte.
Wie wäre es denn stattdessen damit (für ): zusätzlichen Nutzer "Dumbphone" anlegen, nicht mit verbinden, nur Phone-, und Kontakte App auf den Homescreen. Fertig.

PopulærtTidslinjer
Om