snabelen.no er en av mange uavhengige Mastodon-servere du kan bruke for å delta i det desentraliserte sosiale nettet.
Ein norsk heimstad for den desentraliserte mikroblogge-plattformen.

Administrert av:

Serverstatistikk:

364
aktive brukere

#deepseek

5 innlegg5 deltakere0 innlegg i dag

"The U.S. answered #Sputnik with bold #competition not an aggrieved whine that America had been ripped off and abused.
America’s response to rising scientific competition from China—symbolized by #DeepSeek’s R1 matching OpenAI’s o1—has been very different. The DeepSeek Moment has been met not with resolve and competition but with anxiety and #retreat."
marginalrevolution.com/margina

"DeepSeek could soon disappear from Apple and Google's official app stores in Germany as data protection officials accuse the Chinese chatbot of alleged privacy violations.

"DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful," said Berlin Data Protection Commissioner Meike Kamp, in an official announcement dated June 27, 2025. Kamp has called on the Big Tech giant to consider blocking the app in the country.

Another EU member, Italy, already banned Deepseek from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store in January 2025 over similar grounds. The block was enforced about a week after the release of the ChatGPT rival.

According to German authorities, the company behind DeepSeek AI (Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd) violates Art. 46 (1) of the GDPR, which rules the need for "appropriate safeguards" when transferring EU citizens' personal data to a third country.

According to Kamp, DeepSeek failed to convince German officials that users' data is protected when these details are transferred to China, as expected by EU laws."

techradar.com/computing/cyber-

TechRadar · "DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful” – Germany accuses DeepSeek of violating GDPR and asks Google and Apple to block it"DeepSeek's transfer of user data to China is unlawful," said Berlin Data Protection Commissioner
#EU#Germany#AI
Som svar til heise online

@heiseonline Gibts irgend eine haltbare Argumentation bzw. Untersuchung das die Bedenken auch nur irgendwie Sinn ergeben? Das die ärmsten der armen Länder Vorreiter bei solchen Entscheidungen sind heißt für mich nur das dort Geld geflossen ist. Mich würde aber mal wirklich interessieren ob #deepseek tatsächlich ein Sicherheitsproblem ist.

🇩🇪 The German government -- a hopeless regime that is always on the wrong side of history and supports genocide nonstop -- is banning Chinese AI app Deepseek.

Germany has no AI alternatives, so it will only use US AI monopolies.

Silicon Valley is ecstatic.

techradar.com/computing/cyber-

#germany #berlin #tech #finance #frankfurt #geopolitics
@palestine @lebanon #deepseek #tiktok #cdnpoli
#canada #usa
@blackmastodon #china #trade #sanctions
#tariffs #economy #capitalism #education

"While projects like Te Hiku are no doubt valuable, by definition they cannot be scaled-up alternatives to the collective power of American AI capital, which commands resources far greater than many of the world’s states. If it becomes normal for AI tools like ChatGPT to be governed by and for Silicon Valley, we risk seeing the primary means of content production concentrated in the hands of a tiny number of tech barons.

We therefore need to put big solutions on the table. Firstly, regulation: there must be a set of rules that place strict limits on where AI companies get their data from, how their models are trained, and how their algorithms are managed. In addition, all AI systems should be forced to operate within tightly regulated environmental limits: energy usage for generative AI cannot be a free-for-all on a planet under immense ecological stress. AI-powered automated weapons systems should be prohibited. All of this should be subject to stringent, independent audits to ensure compliance.

Secondly, although the concentration of market power in the AI industry took a blow from DeepSeek’s arrival, there remain strong tendencies within AI — and indeed in digital tech as a whole — towards monopolization. Breaking up the tech oligarchy would mean eliminating gatekeepers that concentrate power and control data flows.

Finally, the question of ownership should be a serious part of the debate. Te Hiku shows that when AI tools are built by organizations with entirely different incentive structures in place, they can produce wildly different results. As long as artificial intelligence is designed for the purposes of the competitive accumulation of capital, firms will continue to find ways to exploit labor, degrade the environment, take short cuts in data extraction, and compromise on safety, because if they don’t, one of their competitors will."

jacobin.com/2025/07/altman-ope

jacobin.comSam Altman’s AI Empire Relies on Brutal Labor ExploitationFirms like OpenAI are developing AI in a way that has deeply ominous implications for workers in many different fields. The current trajectory of AI can only be changed through direct confrontation with the overweening power of the tech giants.

Do you use AI/a LLM on a regular basis?
If so, which one do you prefer?

Do you pay a monthly subscription for one?

Boosting appreciated :)

#ai#ki#llm